🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a flawed assessment of the European Union. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective is based on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The actual challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Divide Separating the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, compared to a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the EU. Over this time, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just half of the US level. Strikingly, even Mississippi now boasts a greater average income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly half of the world’s top fifty tech companies are US-based, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

This widening economic gap stems from stronger productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech leadership is decidedly US-centric. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at more than $10bn, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This disparity raises a pressing issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU positioned? Most analysts concede it is essentially a contest between two involving the United States and China, with European nations starting at a clear handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

A number of key reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a much more robust and agile system for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true capital markets union, a factor that limits the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided rules hamper European business. A US startup can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population, is split among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to advance substantial change. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the necessity of sweeping changes.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable much higher levels of commercial innovation.

The continent retains significant strengths: skilled workforce, top-tier education systems, and world-class research institutions. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly boost productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a decisive moment. As the saying goes, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take bold steps to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.