🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "stealing our children's youth". The policy may be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," stated one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on strong data".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and suitable for minors," said a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various politicians to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global bodies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this global discussion unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are no longer content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.